Aggressors and victims in bullying and cyberbullyingA study of personality profiles using the five-factor model

  1. Cristina Alonso 1
  2. Estrella Romero 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Ano de publicación: 2017

Volume: 20

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2017.73 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

Bullying and cyberbullying are highly prevalent in today’s society. However, the personality profiles of different roles involved in this phenomenon remain little known. This study aims (1) to examine the association between bullying and cyberbullying in adolescents; and (2) to analyze the relationship between bullying and cyberbullying in terms of the domains and facets of the five-factor model (FFM). A total of 910 adolescents aged 12 to 19 years old participated. They were administered self-report assessments of aggression and victimization in bullying and cyberbullying, as well as the JS-NEO-S questionnaire. The results provide evidence of co-occurrence between bullying and cyberbullying (p < .001). We observed higher neuroticism in victims and aggressor-victims, higher openness in victims, higher agreeableness in victims and non-aggressor non-victims and higher conscientiousness in non-aggressor non-victims as compared with the rest of the groups (p < .001). Comparison of the four cyberbullying groups showed that cybervictims score higher in neuroticism and openness, cybervictims and non-cybervictims non-cyberaggressors score higher in agreeableness and non-cybervictims non-cyberaggressors score higher in conscientiousness (p < .001) In conclusion, this study provides a broad, systematic view of the personality traits associated with different roles implicated in traditional bullying and cyberbullying.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ak S., Özdemir Y., & Kuzucu Y. (2015). Cybervictimization and cyberbullying: The mediating role of anger, don’t anger me! Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.030
  • Albores-Gallo L., Sauceda-García J., Ruiz-Velasco S., & Roque-Santiago E. (2011). El acoso escolar (bullying) y su asociación con trastornos psiquiátricos en una muestra de escolares en México [Bullying at school and its association with psychiatric disorders in a student sample in Mexico]. Salud Pública de México, 53(3), 220–227.
  • Boudreaux M. J. (2016). Personality-related problems and the five-factor model of personality. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(4), 372–383. https://doi. org/10.1037/per0000185
  • Buelga S., Cava M. J., & Musitu G. (2010). Cyberbullying: Victimización entre adolescentes a través del teléfono móvil y de Internet [Cyberbullying: Victimization among adolescents via cell phone and Internet]. Psicothema, 22(4), 784–789.
  • Buelga S., & Pons J. (2012). Agresiones entre adolescentes a través del teléfono móvil y de internet [Bullying in adolescents via cell phone and internet]. Psychosocial Intervention, 21(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.5093/ in2012v21n1a2
  • Caravaca F., Falcón M., Navarro-Zaragoza J., Luna A., Rodriges O., & Luna A. (2016). Prevalence and patterns of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing among college population in Spain. BMC Public Health, 16, 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2857-8
  • Casas J. A., Del Rey R., & Ortega-Ruiz R. (2013). Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.015
  • Çelik S., Atak H., & Erguzen A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 129–150.
  • De Angelis G., Bacchini D., & Affuso G. (2016). The mediating role of domain judgement in the relation between the Big Five and bullying behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 16–21. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.029
  • Del Rey R., Elipe P., & Ortega-Ruiz R. (2012). Bullying and cyberbullying: Overlapping and predictive value of the co-occurrence. Behavior Psychology, 24, 608–613.
  • Del Rey R., Casas J. A., Ortega-Ruiz R., SchultzeKrumbholz A., Scheithauer H., Smith P., … & Plichta P. (2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065
  • Díaz-Aguado M. J., Martínez R., & Martín J. (2013). El acoso escolar en España. Prevalencia, papeles adoptados por todo el grupo y características a las que atribuyen la victimización [School bullying in Spain. Prevalence, roles adopted group-wide, and characteristics to which they attribute victimization]. Revista de Educación, 362, 348–379. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-164
  • Diepenhorst A. (2014). Big Five personality traits and bullying (Unpublished bachelor’s thesis). Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
  • Digman J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
  • Fredstrom B. K., Adams R. E., & Gilman R. (2011). Electronic and school-based victimization: Unique contexts for adjustment difficulties during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 405–415. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10964-010-9569-7
  • Garaigordobil M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: Una revisión [Prevalence and consequences of cyberbullying: A review]. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 233–254.
  • Garaigordobil M., & Aliri J. (2013). Ciberacoso (cyberbullying) en adolescentes y jóvenes del País Vasco: Diferencias de sexo en víctimas, agresores y observadores [Cyberbullying in adolescents and youths from Basque Country: Gender differences in victims, bullies, and witnesses]. Psicología Conductual, 21(3), 461–474.
  • Goldberg L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five Factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
  • Goodboy A. K., & Martin M. M. (2015). The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the Dark Triad. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 1–4. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052
  • Hayward R. D., Taylor W. D., Smoski M. J., Steffens D. C., & Payne M. E. (2013). Association of five-factor model personality domains and facets with presence, onset, and treatment outcomes of major depression in older adults. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(1), 88–96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.012
  • Katzer C., Fetchenhauer D., & Belschak F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in Internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.1.25
  • Kerr M., Tremblay R. E., Pagani L., & Vitaro F. (1997). Boys’ behavioral inhibition and the risk of later delinquency. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 809–816.
  • Khosa N. (2016). How personality effects [sic] victim’s response to cyberbullying (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
  • Klimstra T. A., Akse J., Hale III, W., Raaijmakers Q., & Meeus W. H. J. (2010). Longitudinal associations between personality traits and problem behavior symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.02.004
  • Kowalski R. M., & Limber S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6, Suppl.1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jadohealth.2007.08.017
  • Luengo A., Sobral J., Romero E., & Gómez-Fraguela J. A. (2002). Biología, personalidad y delincuencia [Biology, personality and delinquency]. Psicothema, 14, 16–25.
  • Lykken D. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047232
  • Lynam D. R., & Widiger T. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 160–178. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007. 21.2.160
  • McCrae R. R., & Costa P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
  • McCrae R. R., & John O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992. tb00970.x
  • Miller J. D., Lynam D., & Leukefeld C. (2003). Examining antisocial behavior through the lens of the five-factor model of Personality. Aggressive Behavior, 29(6), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10064
  • Mitchell K. J., Finkelhor D., Wolak J., Ybarra M. L., & Turner H. (2011). Youth Internet victimization in a broader victimization context. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.009
  • Mitsopoulou E., & Giovazolias T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007
  • Nansel T., Overpeck M., Pilla R. S., Ruan W. J., SimmonsMorton B., & Schmidt P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.
  • Olweus D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Ortega-Ruiz R., Del Rey R., & Casas J. A. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q [Assessment of bullying and cyberbullying, Spanish validation of the EBIP-Q and the ECIP-Q]. Psicología Educativa, 22, 71–79. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004
  • Ortet G., Escrivá P., Ibáñez M. I., Moya J., Villa H., Mezquita L., & Ruipérez M. A. (2010). Versión corta de la adaptación española para adolescentes del NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-S) [Short-form version of the Spanish adaptation of the NEO-PI-R for adolescents (JS NEO-S)]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(2), 327–344.
  • Ortet G., Ibáñez M. I., Moya J., Villa H., Viruela A., & Mezquita L. (2012). Assessing the five-factors of personality in adolescents: The junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 19, 114–130. https://doi. org/10.1177/1073191111410166
  • Peluchette J. V., Karl K., Wood C., & Williams J. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization: Do victims’ personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 424–435. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.028
  • Pyzalski J. (2011). Electronic aggression among adolescents: An old house with a new facade (or even a number of houses). In C. Hällgren, E. Dunkels, & G. M. Frånberg (Eds.), Youth culture and net culture: Online social practices (pp. 278–295). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Polo M. J., León B., Fajardo F., Felipe E., & Palacios V. (2014). Perfiles de personalidad en víctimas de acoso escolar [Personality profiles in victims of bullying at school]. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 409–415.
  • Romero E., & Alonso C. (2017). Callous-unemotional traits and the five-factor model in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 268–274. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.056
  • Samuel D. B., & Widiger T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM–VI–TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
  • Smith P. K. (2015). The nature of cyberbullying and what we can do about it. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 15, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/14713802.12114
  • Sourander A., Jensen P., Rönning J. A., Elonheimo H., Niemelä S., Helenius H., … Almqvist F. (2007). Childhood bullies and victims and their risk of criminality in late adolescence: The Finnish from a boy to a man study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(6), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.6.546
  • Ybarra M. L., & Mitchell K. J. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 319–336. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007
  • Van Geel M., Goemans A., Toprak F., & Vedder P. (2017). Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 231–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.063
  • Waasdorp T. E., & Bradshaw C. P. (2015). The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(5), 483–488. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002
  • White G. (2015, June). Successful anti-bullying approaches. Paper presented at the meeting of the Bullying and Health – Research Exchange Group, Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research, Canada.