Prevención del deterioro de la integridad cutánea en el sacro mediante la aplicación de una espuma de adhesión atraumática.

  1. Álvarez Vázquez, Juan Carlos
  2. Estany Gestal, Ana
  3. Álvarez Suárez, Talía
  4. Bran Mosquera, Julia
  5. Castro Prado, Javier
  6. Gutiérrez Moeda, Esther
  7. Otero Rodríguez, Marta
  8. Rodríguez Rodríguez, María Isabel
  9. Vázquez González, Antonio
Journal:
Metas de enfermería

ISSN: 1138-7262

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 17

Issue: 2

Type: Article

More publications in: Metas de enfermería

Abstract

Objective: to determine if the application of an atraumatic self-adherent foam dressing (Mepilex Border Sacrum®) will reduce or delay the presentation of lesions in the sacral area in those patients with a high risk of developing pressure ulcers. Method: non-randomized clinical trial. The participants were patients from the Geriatrics, Palliative Care and Oncohaematology Departments and the Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, as well as from the Assisted Living Home for Elderly People Castro de Riberas de Lea Sarquavitae. The intervention group was formed by those hospitalized persons who presented a high risk of developing pressure ulcers (between 6 and 12 points in the Braden Scale). The control group included those individuals who had low or moderate risk (=13 points in the Braden Scale) at admission. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Clinical Research in Galicia. Results: there were 46 individuals in each arm of the study. Within the group in which the atraumatic self-adherent foam dressing was applied, there was a much lower number of cutaneous alteration events than in the group where it was not applied (2 vs 20, respectively). At the same time, the number of individuals who developed lesions was 10% lower in the foam dressing group. It was always observed that the number of days required for developing a lesion was significantly higher in the group of patients who had received the atraumatic self- adherent foam dressing (p<0.05). Conclusions: the Mepilex Border Sacrum® atraumatic self- adherent foam dressing could be used as a preventive element for the deterioration of cutaneous integrity in the sacral area, given that it reduces or delays the presentation of lesions in said area in patients with a high risk of developing pressure ulcers.

Bibliographic References

  • Delgado Fernández R, Pérez Vázquez A, Rodríguez Iglesias FJ, Carregal Raño L, González Gutérrez-Soana R, Souto Fernández E, et al. Manuel de prevención y tratamiento de úlceras por presión. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia Consellería de Sanidade Servizo Galego de Saúde División de Asistencia Sanitaria; 2005.
  • Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Estudio nacional sobre los efectos adversos ligados a la hospitalización. ENEAS2005. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2006.
  • European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009.
  • Papanikolaou P, Lyne P, Anthony D. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers: a methodological review. Int J Nurs Stud 2007; 44(2):285-296.
  • Bergstrom N, Demuth PJ, Braden BJ. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Nurs Clin North Am 1987; 22(2):417-428.
  • Defloor T, Schoonhoven L, Fletcher J, Furtado K, Heyman H, Lubbers M, et al. Statement of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel-Pressure Ulcer Classification: Differentiation Between Pressure Ulcers and Moisture Lesions. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2005; 32(5):302-306.
  • Gray M, Bliss DZ, Ermer-Sulten J, Kennedy-Evans KL, Palmer MH. Incontinence associated dermatitis: a consensus. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007; 34(1):45-54.
  • White R. Pain assessment and management in patients with chronic wounds. Nursing Standard 2008; 22(32):62-68.
  • Santamaría N, Gerdtz M, Sage S, McCann J, Freeman A, Vasiliou T, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial. Int Wound J 2013; 27.
  • Brindle CT. Outliers to the Braden Scale: Identifying high-risk ICU patients and the results of prophylactic dressing use. WECT 2010; 30(1).
  • Kalowes P, Li P, Carlson C, Messina V, Llantero L, Lukaszka D, et al. Use of a Soft Silicone, Seif-Adherent, Bordered Foam Dressing to Reduce Pressure Ulcer Formation in High Risk Patients: a randomized clinical trial. Symposium on Advanced Wound Care Fall. Baltimore, Maryland; 2012.
  • Gray M, Bohacek L, Weir D, Zdanuk J. Moisture vs. Pressure: Making Sense Out of Perineal Wounds. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34(2):134-142.