Parto en casa versus parto hospitalario

  1. Eduardo Martínez Martín
  2. Manrique Tejedor, Javier
  3. García Rebollo, Miguel Ángel
  4. Martínez Galán, Paloma
  5. Macarro Ruiz, Dolores
  6. Figuerol Calderó, Mª Immaculada
Revista:
Metas de enfermería

ISSN: 1138-7262

Ano de publicación: 2016

Volume: 19

Número: 6

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Metas de enfermería

Resumo

Objective: to analyze the current trends regarding home birth, as well as to examine the current scientific evidence regarding the advantages of home birth versus hospital birth. Method: a narrative review was conducted, through a search in the following databases: Pubmed, Medline, Uptodate, Scielo, Cuide, Cochrane plus and Academic Google. In order to refine the search, English and Spanish were established as language limits, as well as publication date between 2000 and 2015. Results: a total of 31 documents were selected from the bibliographic search. The selected bibliography included: systematic reviews of randomized controlled clinical trials, randomized clinical trials, observational studies of cohorts and of cases and controls, bibliographic reviews, and a document prepared by the Spanish Federation of Associations of Midwives. These studies show that the safety of home birth is similar to that of hospital birth; no significant differences have been found regarding morbimortality in newborns or mothers. Assisted birth at home requires the lower number of interventions for women, and therefore, its cost is lower. Experts describe that a safe home birth requires assistance by qualified midwives, who must offer truthful scientific information to women, so that they can make their own decision. Conclusions: there is evidence, with currently available studies, of no increase in mother or newborn morbimortality in home birth, as long as there is a low-risk pregnancy, and it is assisted by qualified midwives. It is necessary to conduct randomized and controlled clinical trials in order to study the matter with further detai

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Grupo técnico de trabajo de la OMS. Cuidados en el parto normal: una guía práctica. [Disponible en Internet]. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud. Departamento de Investigación y Salud Reproductiva; 1996 [citado 25 junio 2016]. Disponible en: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1996/WHO_FRH_MSM_96.24_spa.pdf
  • Mallak J. Natural birth vs. birthing naturally. International Journal of Childbirth Education 2009 Sep; 24 (3):35-6,38.
  • Steel A, Adams J, Frawley J, Broom A, Sibbritt D. The characteristics of women who birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital labour ward: A study of a nationally-representative sample of 1835 pregnant women. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2015; 6(3):132-7.
  • Johnson KC, Daviss BA. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. British Medical Journal 2005; 330:1416.
  • Kirby RS, Frost J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs. planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2011 Apr; 204(4):e16.
  • Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2009 Sep 15; 181(6-7):377-83.
  • Van der Kooy J, Poeran J, de Graaf JP, Birnie E, Denktas S, Steegers EA, et al. Planned home compared with planned hospital births in the Netherlands: intrapartum and early neonatal death in low-risk pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118(5):1037-46
  • Faucher MA. Planned home birth with community midwives has outcomes as good or better than planned hospital birth. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 2012 Mar; 57(2):201-2.
  • Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 2009 Sep; 36(3):180-9.
  • Halfdansdottir B, Smarason AK, Olafsdottir OA, Hildingsson I, Sveinsdottir H. Outcome of planned home and hospital births among low-risk women in Iceland in 2005-2009: a retrospective cohort study. Birth 2015; 42(1):16-26.
  • Blu LS, Sharmin T, Ronsmans. Attending Home vs. Clinic-Based Deliveries: Perspectives of Skilled Birth Attendants in Matlab, Bangladesh. Reproductive Health Matters 2006; 14(27):51-60.
  • Crizóstomo CD, Nery IS, Luz MHB. Women experience with home and hospital childbirth. Anna Nery School Journal of Nursing/Escola Anna Nery Revista de Enfermagem 2007 Mar; 11(1):98-104.
  • Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs. planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2010 Sep; 203(3):243.e1-8.
  • Remez L. Planned home birth can be as safe as hospital delivery for women with low-risk pregnancies. Family Planning Perspectives 1997; 29(3):141-3.
  • Linnea Klee. Home away from home: the alternative birth center. Social Science & Medicine 1986; 23(1):9-16.
  • Daviss BA, Kenneth C. Home vs. hospital birth. Recent meta-analysis is misleading. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition) 2010 Sep 4; 341:c4699.
  • Olsen O, Jewell MD. Home versus hospital birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev-January 2000; (2).
  • Olsen O, Clausen JA. Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; (9).
  • Blix E, Kumle M, Kjærgaard H, Øian P, Lindgren HE. Transfer to hospital in planned home births: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth -January 1, 2014; 14:179.
  • Vedam S, Leeman L, Cheyney M, Fisher TJ, Myers S, Low LK, Ruhl C. Transfer from planned Home Birth to Hospital: Improving Interprofessional Collaboration. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 2014 Nov; 59(6):624-34.
  • Janssen PA, Mitton C. Costs of planned home vs. Hospital Birth in British Columbia Attended by Registered Midwives and Physicians. Aghajanian J3. PLoS ONE - January 1 2015; 10(7).
  • Havard J. Hospital versus home births. Midwives 2009 Jun-Jul; 12(3):18.
  • Murray-Davis B, McDonald H, Rietsma A, Coubrough M, Hutton E. Deciding on home or hospital birth: Results of the Ontario choice of birthplace survey. Midwifery 2014; 30(7):969-76.
  • Dunn P. Childbirth: home or hospital? British Journal of Midwifery 2004 Jun; 12(6):380-5.
  • Khazan O. Hospital or home birth? Los Angeles Times-Southern California Edition (Front Page) 2011 Jul 11:Health: E1,E5.
  • Groenendaal F. Home birth: as safe as in hospital? An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2009 Nov; 116(12):1684-5.
  • Grupo de trabajo sobre la atención al parto y postparto natural. Posicionamiento de la FAME sobre la atención al parto en casa. Federación de Asociaciones de Matronas de España. 2015. [citado 25 junio 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.federacion-matronas.org/noticias/i/19599/70/posicionamiento-de-la-fame-sobre-laatencion-del-parto-en-casa
  • Raymond T. Home birth, birth center, or hospital birth: how to help your clients choose. International Journal of Childbirth Education 1992 May; 7(2):9-10.
  • Wiegers TA, Van Der Zee J, Kerssens JJ, Keirse MJN. Home birth or short-stay hospital birth in a low risk population in the Netherlands. Social Science & Medicine 1998 Jun; 46(11):1505-11.
  • Schuler WC. Home birth, freestanding birthing center, or hospital birth - is there another option? A German experiment... this paper was presented at the ASPO/Lamaze 1991 Annual Conference, October 16-19, Hyatt Regency at Union Station, St Louis, Missouri. Journal of Perinatal Education 1992 Spring; 1(1):11-9.
  • Lemay G. Pushing situations: hospital vs. home. Midwifery Today 2000 Autumn; (55):11.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet