Influencia de la altura del arco longitudinal interno y la posición del pie en el dolor y la disfunción en población adulta

  1. Carolina Rosende-Bautista 1
  2. Francisco Alonso-Tajes 1
  3. María Reina-Bueno 2
  4. Sergio Pérez-García 1
  5. María Teresa Seoane-Pillado 1
  1. 1 Facultad Enfermería y Podología de Ferrol. Universidad A Coruña, España.
  2. 2 Departamento de Podología. Universidad de Sevilla, España
Revista:
Revista española de podología

ISSN: 0210-1238

Ano de publicación: 2022

Volume: 33

Número: 1

Páxinas: 41-49

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.20986/REVESPPOD.2022.1635/2022 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Revista española de podología

Resumo

Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze how the medial longitudinal arch morphology and the foot position determines functional capacity and its relation to pain in adult population. Materials and methods: an observational cross-sectional study was carried out in an adult population of n = 423 subjects, α = 0,05; precision ± 5 % in the estimates of the variables of interest. Medial longitudinal arch morphology/height was determined obtaining normalized anthropometric dimensions and footprint morphology according to an arch index. Foot Posture Index-6 was used to determine foot posture. The degree of foot pain and dysfunction was obtained by using the Manchester Foot Pain and Dysfunction Questionnaire. A descriptive analysis of the sociodemographic and clinical variables of the subjects was performed. In the bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, it was determined which variables were related to pain and foot function, estimating raw and adjusted values of odds ratio (OR). Results: In the function dimension, female sex (OR adjusted = 2.62 95 % IC 1.55-4.44, p < 0.001) and having at least one foot pronated or very pronated, (OR adjusted = 1.98; 95 % IC 1.17-3.37, p = 0.011), appeared as independent factors that influenced obtaining scores above the median. In the pain dimension, age (OR adjusted =1.02; 95 % IC 1.01-1.03, < 0.05), female sex (OR adjusted = 2.52, 95 % IC 1.52-4.19, p < 0.001) and presenting flat footprint morphology (OR adjusted = 2.10, 95 % IC 1.21-3.67, p < 0.05) were the significant variables to the group with scores higher than the median. Conclusions: Being a woman and having pronated positions increase the probability of higher scores when evaluating dysfunctional disabilities. In the pain dimension, the probability of obtaining higher scores increases with age, female sex and having a flat footprint morphology.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Badlissi F, Dunn JE, Link CL, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB, Felson DT. Foot musculoskeletal disorders, pain, and foot-related functional limitation in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(6):1029-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53315.x.
  • Caravaggi P, Matias AB, Taddei UT, Ortolani M, Leardini A, Sacco ICN. Reliability of medial-longitudinal-arch measures for skin-markers based kinematic analysis. J Biomech. 2019;88:180-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.03.017.
  • Castro AP, Rebelatto JR, Aurichio TR, Greve P. The influence of arthritis on the anthropometric parameters of the feet of older women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50(2):136-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.02.014.
  • Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: A useful measure from footprints. J Biomech. 1987;20(5):547-51. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90255-7.
  • Crosbie J, Burns J. Are in-shoe pressure characteristics in symptomatic idiopathic pes cavus related to the location of foot pain? Gait Posture. 2008;27(1):16-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.013.
  • Dufour AB, Losina E, Menz HB, LaValley MP, Hannan MT. Obesity, foot pain and foot disorders in older men and women. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017;11(4):445-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2016.11.001.
  • Evans AM, Copper AW, Scharfbillig RW, Scutter SD, Williams MT. Reliability of the foot posture index and traditional measures of foot position. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(1-6):203-13. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-93-3-203.
  • Garrow AP, Silman AJ, Macfarlane GJ. The cheshire foot pain and disability survey: A population survey assessing prevalence and associations. Pain. 2004;110(1-2):378-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.04.019.
  • Gates LS, Arden NK, Hannan MT, Roddy E, Gill TK, Hill CL, et al. Prevalence of foot pain across an international consortium of population based cohorts. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(5):661-70. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23829.
  • Gill TK, Menz HB, Landorf KB, Arnold JB, Taylor AW, Hill CL. Predictors of foot pain in the community: the North West Adelaide health study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016;9(3):23. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-016-0150-9. Gill TK, Menz HB, Landorf KB, Arnold JB, Taylor AW, Hill CL. Predictors of foot pain in the community: The North West Adelaide health study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016;9:23. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-016-0150-9.
  • Hawke F, Burns J. Understanding the nature and mechanism of foot pain. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009;2:1. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-1.
  • Hendry GJ, Fenocchi L, Woodburn J, Steultjens M. Foot pain and foot health in an educated population of a dults: results from the Glasgow Caledonian University Alumni Foot Health Survey. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018;11(1):48. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-018-0290-1.
  • Hill CL, Gill TK, Menz HB, Taylor AW. Prevalence and correlates of foot pain in a population-based study: The North West Adelaide health study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1(1):2. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-2.
  • Kirby KA. Sistema de reparto de cargas de arco longitudinal del pie. Rev Esp Podol. 2017;28(1):37-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.repod.2017.03.002.
  • López López D, de los Ángeles Bouza Prego M, Requeijo Constenla A, Luis Saleta Canosa J, Bautista Casasnovas A, Alonso Tajes F, et al. The impact of foot arch height on quality of life in 6-12 year olds. Colomb Med. 2014;45(45):168-72. DOI: 10.25100/cm.v45i4.1690. López-López D, Vilar-Fernández JM, Barros-García G, Losa-Iglesias ME, Palomo-López P, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. Foot arch height and quality of life in adults: A strobe observational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1555. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071555.
  • Mall NA, Hardaker WM, Nunley JA, Queen RM. The reliability and reproducibility of foot type measurements using a mirrored foot photo box and digital photography compared to caliper measurements. J Biomech. 2007;40(5):1171-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.021.
  • McPoil TG, Cornwall MW, Vicenzino B, Teyhen DS, Molloy JM, Christie DS, et al. Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio. Foot. 2008;18(4):220-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2008.06.002.
  • McPoil TG, Hunt GC. Evaluation and Management of Foot and Ankle Disorders: Present Problems and Future Directions. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 1995;21(6):381-8. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.6.381. Menz HB, Dufour AB, Katz P, Hannan MT. Foot pain and pronated foot type are associated with self-reported mobility limitations in older adults: The framingham foot study. Gerontology. 2016;62(3):289-95. DOI: 10.1159/000442089.
  • Menz HB, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Hannan MT. Planus Foot Posture and Pronated Foot Function are Associated with Foot Pain: The Framingham Foot Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(12):1991-9. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22079.
  • Menz HB, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Hannan MT. Planus Foot Posture and Pronated Foot Function are Associated with Foot Pain: The Framingham Foot Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65(12):1991-9. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22079.
  • Menz HB, Tiedemann A, Kwan MMS, Plumb K, Lord SR. Foot pain in community-dwelling older people: an evaluation of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. Rheumatology. 2006;45(7):863-7. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel002.
  • Neb M, Goyal M, Mahajan N. Association of Chronic Plantar Heel Pain with Foot Posture and Functional Limitation A Correlation Study . Int J Phys Educ Sports Health. 2014;1(1):17-9.
  • Ojukwu CP, Anyanwu EG, Nwafor GG. Correlation between Foot Arch Index and the Intensity of Foot, Knee, and Lower Back Pain among Pregnant Women in a South-Eastern Nigerian Community. Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(5):480-4. DOI: 10.1159/000481622.
  • Pita-Fernandez S, Gonzalez-Martin C, Aalonso-Tajes F, Seoane-Pillado T, Pertega-Diaz S, Perez-Garcia S, et al. Flat foot in a random population and its impact on quality of life and functionality. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(4):22-7. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24362.9697.
  • Redmond A. The foot posture index: easy quantification of standing foot posture: six item version: FPI-6: user guide and manual. United Kingdom; 2005. p. 1-19.
  • Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: The Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(1):89-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002.
  • Reina-Bueno M, Munuera-Martínez PV, Pérez-García S, Vázquez-Bautista MDC, Domínguez-Maldonado G, Palomo-Toucedo IC. Foot Pain and Morphofunctional Foot Disorders in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):5042. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18095042. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(1):45-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80041-7.
  • Thomas MJ, Roddy E, Zhang W, Menz HB, Hannan MT, Peat GM, et al. The population prevalence of foot and ankle pain in middle and old age: A systematic review. Pain. 2011;152(12):2870-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.019.
  • Tong JWK, Kong PW. Association between foot type and lower extremity injuries: Systematic literature review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(10):700-14. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4225.
  • Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):864-71. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/80.9.864.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet