Resultados neonatales tras parto en el aguaEstudio de cohortes retrospectivo

  1. Susana Iglesias-Casas 1
  2. María Reyes Pérez-Fernández 2
  3. María Sol Montenegro-Alonso 1
  4. María Esther Parada-Cabaleiro 1
  5. Lorena Sanmartín-Freitas 1
  6. Desirée Mena-Tudela 3
  1. 1 Servicio de Obstetricia, Hospital do Salnés, Vilagarcía de Arousa, España
  2. 2 Escuela de Enfermería de Ourense, Universidade de Vigo, Ourense, España
  3. 3 Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universitat Jaume I., Castelló de la Plana, Castelló, España
Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Enfermería clínica

ISSN: 1130-8621

Ano de publicación: 2023

Volume: 33

Número: 4

Páxinas: 292-302

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENFCLI.2023.05.005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Enfermería clínica

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

Objective To compare neonatal outcomes between water births, births with immersion only during labour, and births in which immersion was never used. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed including mother-baby dyads attended between 2009 and 2019 at the Hospital do Salnés regional hospital (Pontevedra, Spain). These women were categorised into 3 groups: water birth; immersion only during dilation; and women who never used immersion. Several sociodemographic-obstetric variables were studied and the main outcome was the admission of the neonate to the intensive care unit (NICU). Permission was obtained from the responsible provincial ethics committee. Descriptive statistics were used and between-group comparisons were performed using variance for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables. Multivariate analysis was performed with backward stepwise logistic regression and incidence risk ratios with 95%CI were calculated for each independent variable. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS® statistical software. Results A total of 1,191 cases were included. 404 births without immersions; 397 immersions only during the first stage of labor; and 390 waterbirths were included. No differences were found in the need to transfer new-borns to a NICU (P = .735). In the waterbirth cohort, neonatal resuscitation (P < .001, OR: 0,1), as well as respiratory distress (P = .005 OR: 0,2) or neonatal problems during admission (P < .001, OR: 0,2), were lower. In the immersion only during labor cohort, less neonatal resuscitation (P =.003; OR: 0,4) and respiratory distress (P = .019; OR: 0,4) were found. The probability of not breastfeeding upon discharge was higher for the land birth cohort (P < .001, OR: 0,4;). Conclusions The results of this study indicated that water birth did not influence the need for NICU admission, but was associated with fewer adverse neonatal outcomes, such as resuscitation, respiratory distress, or problems during admission.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • E.R. Cluett, E. Burns, A. Cuthbert Immersion in water during labour and birth Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 5 (2018), p. CD000111, 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4
  • E. Burns, C. Feeley, P.J. Hall, J. Vanderlaan Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth BMJ Open., 12 (2022), p. e056517, 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2021-056517
  • Committee on Obstetric Practice; American Academy of Pediatrics ACOG Committee Opinion no. 594: Immersion in water during labor and delivery Obstet Gynecol., 123 (2014), pp. 912-915, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000445585.52522.14
  • M. Iriondo Sanz, M. Sánchez Luna, F. Botet Mussons, T. Martínez-Astorquiza, J.M. Lailla Vicens, J. Figueras Aloy Underwater delivery Consensus of the Spanish Neonatology Society and the Perinatal Section of the Spanish Obstetrics and Gynecology Society An Pediatr., 82 (2015), p. 108.e1-3, 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.06.013
  • American Association of Birth Centers. Position Statement: Immersion in water during labor and delivery. Perkomenville, PA; 2014.
  • American College of Nurse-Midwives. Hydrotherapy during labor and birth. Silver Spring; 2014.
  • Health Service Executive. Guideline on the Management of Water Birth, HSE Home Birth Service. 2017.
  • Mesa do Colégio da Especialidade de Enfermagem de saúde Materna e Obstétrica. Parto na água. Parecer no 51 /2014. 2014.
  • The Royal College of Midwives US waterbirth study: RCM publishes response Midwives, 17 (2014), p. 11
  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Warm water immersion during labour and birth. 2021.
  • The Australian College of Midwives. Position Statement on the use of water immersion for labour and birth. 2013.
  • New Zealand College of Midwives. Consensus Statement: The Use of Water for Labour and Birth. 2015.
  • Committee Opinion No. 679: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery Obstet Gynecol., 128 (2016), pp. e231-e236, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001771
  • E. Reviriego Rodrigo, N. Ibargoyen-Roteta, S. Carreguí Vilar, L. Mediavilla Serrano, S. Montero Carcaboso, G. Ares Mateos, et al. Inmersión en agua durante el parto Servicio de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias del País Vasco. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias: OSTEBA, Ministerio de Sanidad, España (2022), p. 162
  • E. Neiman, E. Austin, A. Tan, C.M. Anderson, E. Chipps Outcomes of Waterbirth in a US Hospital-Based Midwifery Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Water Immersion During Labor and Birth J Midwifery Women's Heal., 65 (2020), pp. 216-223, 10.1111/jmwh.13033
  • D.D. Davis, A. Roshan, C.D. Canela, M. Varacallo Shoulder Dystocia StatPearls Publishing (2022)
  • J. Vanderlaan Retrospective Cohort Study of Hydrotherapy in Labor J Obstet Gynecol neonatal Nurs., 46 (2017), pp. 403-410, 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.11.018
  • T. Cristina, T. Mara, S. Arianna, S. Gennaro, C. Rosaria, G. Pantaleo Impact of waterbirth on post-partum hemorrhage, genital trauma, retained placenta and shoulder dystocia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol., 276 (2022), pp. 26-37, 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.202206016
  • M.L. Bovbjerg, M. Cheyney, C. Everson Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Following Waterbirth: The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009 Cohort J Midwifery Women's Heal., 61 (2016), pp. 11-20, 10.1111/jmwh.12394
  • J. Allen, Y. Gao, H. Dahlen, M. Reynolds, M. Beckmann, C. Cooper, et al. Is a randomized controlled trial of waterbirth possible? An Australian feasibility study Birth., 49 (2022), pp. 697-708, 10.1111/BIRT. 12635
  • K. Mohd Salameh, V.A. Paraparambil, A. Sarfrazul, H.L. Hussain, S.S. Thyvilayil, A.S. Mahmoud Effects of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Short Term Neonatal Morbidity Int J Womens Health., 12 (2020), pp. 59-70, 10.2147/IJWH.S228738
  • J.M. Bailey, R.E. Zielinski, C.L. Emeis, L. Kane Low A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings Birth., 47 (2020), pp. 98-104, 10.1111/birt.12473
  • H. Ulfsdottir, S. Saltvedt, S. Georgsson Waterbirth in Sweden – a comparative study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand., 97 (2018), pp. 341-348, 10.1111/aogs.13286
  • J. Vanderlaan, P.J. Hall, M.J. Lewitt Neonatal outcomes with water birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis Midwifery., 59 (2018), pp. 27-38, 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.023
  • P.J. Peacock, S.T. Zengeya, L. Cochrane, M. Sleath Neonatal Outcomes Following Delivery in Water: Evaluation of Safety in a District General Hospital Cureus., 10 (2018), p. e2208, 10.7759/cureus.2208
  • S. Orbach-Zinger, R. Landau, A. Davis, O. Oved, L. Caspi, S. Fireman, et al. The Effect of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in a Mixed-Parity Cohort Anesth Analg., 129 (2019), pp. 784-791, 10.1213/ANE. 0000000000003442
  • S. Martínez-Vázquez, A. Hernández-Martínez, J. Rodríguez-Almagro, R.A. Peinado-Molina, J.M. Martínez-Galiano Determinants and Factors Associated with the Maintenance of Exclusive Breastfeeding after Hospital Discharge after Birth Healthcare., 10 (2022), p. 733, 10.3390/healthcare10040733
  • C. Lechosa-Muñiz, M. Paz-Zulueta, S.M. Sota, M.S. de Adana Herrero, E.C. del Rio, J. Llorca, et al. Factors associated with duration of breastfeeding in Spain: A cohort study Int Breastfeed J., 15 (2020), p. 79, 10.1186/s13006-020-00324-6
  • M. Villar, L. Santa-Marina, M. Murcia, P. Amiano, S. Gimeno, F. Ballester, et al. Social Factors Associated with Non-initiation and Cessation of Predominant Breastfeeding in a Mother–Child Cohort in Spain Matern Child Health J., 22 (2018), pp. 725-734, 10.1007/s10995-018-2441-1
  • A. Lathrop, C.F. Bonsack, D.M. Haas Women's experiences with water birth: A matched groups prospective study Birth., 45 (2018), pp. 416-423, 10.1111/birt.12362
  • Naciones Unidas. Dictamen del Comité en virtud del artículo 4, párrafo 2 c), del Protocolo Facultativo respecto de la comunicación núm. 138/2018. Ginebra; 2020.
  • J. Henderson, E.E. Burns, A.L. Regalia, G. Casarico, M.G. Boulton, L.A. Smith Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: Prospective observational study BMC Pregnancy Childbirth., 14 (2014), p. 17, 10.1186/1471-2393-14-17
  • H. Taylor, I. Kleine, S. Bewley, E. Loucaides, A. Sutcliffe Neonatal outcomes of waterbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed., 101 (2016), pp. F357-F365, 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309600
Fonte de datos: Dialnet