Efectos de la estimulación transcraneal con corriente directa (tDCS) sobre el consumo de tabaco, la motivación y la autoeficacia para dejar de fumar

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abrams, D.B. y Biener, L. (1992). Motivational characteristics of smokers in the workplace: A public health challenge. Preventive Medicine, 21, 679-687. https://doi. org/10.1016/0091-7435(92)90075-s
• Anastassiou, C.A., Montgomery, S.M., Barahona, M., Buzsaki, G. y Koch C. (2010). The effect of spatially inhomogeneous extracellular electric fields on neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 30, 1925–1936. https://doi. org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3635-09.2010
• Antal, A., Alekseichuk, I., Bikson, M., Brockmöller, J., Brunoni, A.R., Chen, R. y Fregni, F. (2017). Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(9), 1774-1809. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001
• Ardolino, G., Bossi, B., Barbieri, S. y Priori, A. (2005). Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain. Journal of Physiology (London) 568:653–63. https://doi.org/10.1113/ jphysiol.2005.088310
• Arnedillo, J.M. y De Osma, F.H.G. (2000). Factores asociados al éxito en programas para dejar de fumar. Adicciones, 12(3), 329-341.
• Baer, J. S. y Lichtenstein, E. (1988). Cognitive assessment. In D. M. Donovan y G. A. Marlatt (Eds.) Assessment of addictive behaviors (pp.189-213). New York: Guilford Press.
• Barrueco M., Hernández M.A. y Torrecilla M. (2009). Manual de prevención y tratamiento del tabaquismo (4a ed). Badalona, España: E.U.R.O.M.E.D.I.C.E., Ediciones Médicas, S.L.
• Batista, E.K., Klauss, J., Fregni, F., Nitsche, M.A. y Nakamura-Palacios, E.M. (2015). A randomized placebo-controlled trial of targeted prefrontal cortex modulation with bilateral tDCS in patients with crackcocaine dependence. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacoly 18(12). https://doi. org/10.1093/ijnp/pyv066
• Becoña, E. (1994). Tratamiento del tabaquismo. En Graña, J.L.: Conductas adictivas. Teoría, evaluación y tratamiento. Boggio, P.S., Liguori, P, Sultani, N, Rezende, L, Fecteau, S. y Fregni, F. (2009). Cumulative priming effects of cortical stimulation on smoking cue-induced craving. Neuroscience Letters 463, 82–86. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.041
• Bono-Cabré, R. y Arnau-Gras J. (2014). Diseños de caso único en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
• Borland, R., Yong, H. H., O’Connor, R. J., Hyland, A. y Thompson, M. E. (2010). The reliability and predictive validity of the Heaviness of Smoking Index and its two components: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country study. Nicotine and Tobacco Reserarch 12: S45–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq038
• Brody, A.L., Mandelkern, M.A., Jarvik, M.E., Lee, G.S., Smith, E.C. y Huang, J.C. (2004). Differences between smokers and nonsmokers in regional gray matter volumes and densities. Biological Psychiatry, 55(1):77–84. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00610-3
• Chawla, M. y Garrison, K.A. (2018). Neurobiological Considerations for Tobacco Use Disorder. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 5(4), 238-248. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40473-018-0168-3
• Chib, V.S., Yun, K., Takahashi, H. y Shimojo, S. (2013). Noninvasive remote activation of the ventral midbrain by transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex. Translational Psychiatry, 3(6), e268. https:// doi.org/10.1038/tp.2013.44
• Coles, A.S., Kozak, K. y George, T.P. (2018). A review of brain stimulation methods to treat substance use disorders. The American journal on addictions 27(2), 71-91. https:// doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12674
• Espert-Tortajada, R. y López-Ruiz, P. (2018). Neuromodulación: Terapias cerebrales no invasivas coadyuvantes para el tratamiento de las drogadicciones. Francisco Pascual Pastor (Presidencia). XLV Jornadas Nacionales de Socidrogalcohol. Actas del Congreso.
• Espert-Tortajada, R., Rebull-Monje, M y GadeaDoménech, M. (2021). La estimulación transcraneal con corriente directa (tDCS) como tratamiento coadyuvante en el trastorno por consumo de tabaco: Situación actual y perspectivas de futuro. Revista española de drogodependencias, 46 (1): 5-20
• Falcone, M., Bernardo, L., Ashare, R.L., Hamilton, R., Faseyitan, O., Loughead, J. y Lerman, C. (2016) Transcranial Direct Current Brain Stimulation Increases Ability to Resist Smoking. Brain Stimulation Journal 9, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.10.004
• Fecteau, S., Agosta, S., Home-Blanchet, A., Fregni, F., Boggio, P., Ciraulo, D., y PascualLeone, A. (2014). Modulation of smoking and decision-making behaviors with transcranial direct current stimulation in tobacco smokers: a preliminary study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 140, 78–84. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.036
• Feil, J. y Zangen, A. (2010). Brain stimulation in the study and treatment of addiction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 559-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.006
• Filmer, H.L., Dux, P.E. y Mattingley, J.B. (2014). Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends in neurosciences, 37(12), 742-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003
• Fox, M.D., Buckner, R.L., Liu, H.S., Chakravarty, M.M., Lozano, A.M. y Pascual-Leone, A. (2014). Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(41), E4367–75. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1405003111
• Frank, E., Wilfurth, S., Landgrebe, M., Eichhammer, P., Hajak, G. y Langguth, B. (2010). Anodal skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimulation 3, 58–59. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.04.002
• Fregni, F., El-Hagrassy, M. M., Pacheco-Barrios, K., Carvalho, S., Leite, J., Simis, M., Brunelin, J., Nakamura-Palacios, E. M., Marangolo, P., Venkatasubramanian, G., San-Juan, D., Caumo, W., Bikson, M., Brunoni, A. R., & Neuromodulation Center Working Group (2021). Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 24(4), 256–313. https://doi. org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaa051
• Fregni, F., Liguouri, P, Facteau, S., Nitche, M.A., Pascual-Leone, A. y Boggio, P.S. (2008). Cortical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation reduces cue-provoked smoking craving: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 69, 32–40. https://doi. org/10.4088/jcp.v69n0105
• Fukuda, H. y Kitani M. (1996). Cigarette smoking is correlated with the periventricular hyperintensity grade of brain magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 27:645–649. https://doi. org/10.1161/01.str.27.4.645
• Giovino, G.A., Henningfield, J.E., Tomar, S.L., Escobedo, L.G. y Slade, J. (2005). Epidemiology of tobacco use and dependence. Epidemiologic Reviews 17:48–65. https:// doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev. a036185
• Goldstein, R.Z. y Volkow, N.D. (2011). Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(11), 652–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nrn3119
• Goldstein, R.Z. y Volkow, N.D. (2012). Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: Neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12(11): 652-669. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nrn3119
• Gwaltney, C.J., Shiffman, S., Balabanis, M.H. y Paty, J. A. (2005). Dynamic self-efficacy and outcome expectancies: prediction of smoking lapse and relapse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 114: 661–75. https://doi. org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.661
• Hagimoto, A., Nakamura, M., Morita, T., Masui, S. y Oshima, A. (2009). Smoking cessation patterns and predictors of quitting smoking among the Japanese general population: a 1-year follow-up study. Addiction 105: 164–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360- 0443.2009.02735.x
• Heatherton, T.F., Kozlowski, L.T., Frecker, R.C. y Fagerström, K.O. (1991). The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addictions, 86, 1119-1127. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
• Hellman, R., Cummings, K.M., Haughey, B.P., Zielezny, M.A. y O’Shea, R.M. (2001). Predictors of attempting and succeeding at smoking cessation. Health Education Research 6: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/ her/6.1.77
• Jansen, J.M., Daams, J.G., Koeter, M.W., Veltman, D.J., Van Den Brink, W. y Goudriaan, A.E. (2013). Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: a meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2472-2480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neubiorev.2013.07.009
• Kang, N., Kim, R. K., & Kim, H. J. (2019). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on symptoms of nicotine dependence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addictive behaviors, 96, 133–139. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.006
• Klauss J., Penido Pinheiro L.C., Silva Merlo B.L., de Almeida Correia Santos G., Fregni F. y Nitsche M.A. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of targeted prefrontal cortex modulation with tDCS in patients with alcohol dependence. International Journal os Neuropsychopharmacology, 17(11):1793–803. https://doi. org/10.1017/S1461145714000984
• Koob, G.F. y Volkow, N.D. (2016). Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 760-773. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00104-8
• Lafaucheur, J.P., Antal, A., Ayache, S.S., Benninger, D.H., Brunelin, J., Cogiamanian, F., Cotelli, M., De Ridder, D., Ferrucci, Langguth, B., Marangolo, P., Mylius, V., Nitche, M.A., Padberg, F., Palm, U., Pulet, E., Priori, A., Rossi, S., Schecklmann, M., Vanneste, S., Ziemann, U., Garcia-Larrea, L. y Paulus, W. (2017). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical Neurophysiology 128: 56–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clinph.2016.10.087
• Li, L., Borland, R., Yong, H.H., Fong, G.T., BansalTravers, M. y Quah, A. (2010). Predictors of smoking cessation among adult smokers in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey. Nicotine and Tobbacco Research 12: S34–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ ntq030
• Li, L., Feng, G., Jiang, Y., Yong, H.H., Borland, R. y Fong, G.T. (2011). Prospective predictors of quitting behaviours among adult smokers in six cities in China: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey. Addiction 106: 1335–45. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03444.x
• Liebetanz, D., Nitsche, M.A., Tergau, F. y Paulus W. (2002). Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulationinduced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 125:2238–47. https:// doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf238
• Matsumoto, H. y Ugawa, Y. (2016). Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 2, 19-25. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003
• Meng, Z., Liu, C., Yu, C., & Ma, Y. (2014). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the frontal-parietal-temporal area attenuates smoking behavior. Journal of psychiatric research, 54, 19–25. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.007
• Mondino, M., Luck, D., Grot, S., Januel, D., Suaud-Chagny, M.F., Poulet, E. y Brunelin, J. (2018). Effects of repeated transcranial direct current stimulation on smoking, craving and brain reactivity to smoking cues. Scientific reports, 8(1), 8724. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-018-27057-1
• Nitsche, M.A., Fricke, K., Henschke, U., Schlitterlau, A., Liebetanz, D. y Lang, N. (2003). Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. The Journal of Physiology 553:293–301. https://doi. org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916
• Palm, U., Keeser, D., Schiller, C., Fintescu, Z., Nitsche, M., Reisinger, E. y Padberg, F. (2008). Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation 1, 386–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.04.003
• Parker, R. I. y Vannest, K. J. (2009). An improved effect size for single case research: NonOverlap of All Pairs (NAP). Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. beth.2008.10.006
• Parvaz, M. A., Rabin, R. A., Adams, F., & Goldstein, R. Z. (2022). Structural and functional brain recovery in individuals with substance use disorders during abstinence: A review of longitudinal neuroimaging studies. Drug and alcohol dependence, 232, 109319. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109319
• Perri, R. L., & Perrotta, D. (2021). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex reduces cigarette craving in not motivated to quit smokers: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Addictive behaviors, 120, 106956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. addbeh.2021.106956
• Piasecki, T.M. (2006). Relapse to smoking. Clinical psychology review, 26(2), 196-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.007
• Prochaska, J.O. y Diclemente, C.C. (1983). Stages and processes of self changes in smoking towards and integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology 51:390-5. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022- 006x.51.3.390
• Prochaska, J.O. y Prochaska, J.M. (1993). Modelo transteórico de cambio para conductas adictivas. En M. Casas y M. Gossop (Eds.), Tratamientos psicológicos en drogodependencias: recaída y prevención de recaídas (pp. 85- 136). Sitges: Ediciones Neurociencias.
• Raz A, y Michels R. (2007). Contextualizing specificity: specific and nonspecific effects of treatment. Am J Clin Hypnosis 50, 177-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2007 .10401614
• Richmond, R.L., Kehoe, L. y Webster, I.W. (1993). Multivariate models for predicting abstention following intervention to stop smoking by general practitioner. Addiction 88:1127-35. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02132.x
• Riedel, P., Kabisch, S., Ragert, P. y von Kriegstein, K. (2012). Contact dermatitis after transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimulation. 5, 432–434. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.09.001
• Rodríguez, N., Opisso, E., Pascual-Leone, A. y Soler, M.D. (2014). Skin lesions induced by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation 7, 765–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.06.005
• Sanz, J. y García-Vera, M.P. (2015). Técnicas para el análisis de diseños de caso único en la práctica clínica: ejemplos de aplicación en el tratamiento de víctimas de atentados terroristas. Clinica y Salud 26, 167-180.
• Shiozawa, P., da Silva, M.E., Raza, R., Uchida, R.R., Cordeiro, Q., Fregni, F. y Brunoni, A.R. (2013). Safety of repeated transcranial direct current stimulation in impaired skin: a case report. The Journal of ECT 29, 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/ YCT.0b013e318279c1a1
• Smith, R.C., Boules, S., Mattiuz, S., Youssef, M., Tobe, R. H., Sershen, H., Lajtha, A., Nolan, K., Amiaz, R. y Davis, J. M. (2015). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognition, symptoms, and smoking in schizophrenia: a randomized controlled study. Schizophrenia research, 168(1-2), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. schres.2015.06.011
• Sreeraj, V. S., Arumugham, S. S., & Venkatasubramanian, G. (2023). Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatry Indian journal of psychiatry, 65(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry. indianjpsychiatry_496_22
• Szasz, P.L., Szentagotai, A. y Hofmann, S.G. (2012). Effects of emotion regulation strategies on smoking craving, attentional bias, and task persistence. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(5), 333–40. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.02.010
• Vangeli, E., Stapleton, J., Smit, E.S., Borland, R. y West, R. (2011). Predictors of attempts to stop smoking and their success in adult general population samples: a systematic review. Addiction, 106(12), 2110-2121. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03565.x
• Vitor de Souza Brangioni, M. C., Pereira, D. A., Thibaut, A., Fregni, F., Brasil-Neto, J. P., & Boechat-Barros, R. (2018). Effects of Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motivation to Quit in Tobacco Smokers: A Randomized, Sham Controlled, Double-Blind Trial. Frontiers in pharmacology, 9, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fphar.2018.00014
• Wang, J., Wei, Y., Wen, J. y Li, X. (2015). Skin burn after single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation 8, 165–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. brs.2014.10.015
• Wing, V.C., Barr, M.S., Wass, C.E., Lipsman, N., Lozano, A.M., Daskalakis, Z.J. y Geroge, T.P. (2013). Brain stimulation methods to treat tobacco addiction. Brain Stimulation, 6(3), 221–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. brs.2012.06.008
• Xu J., Fregni, F., Brody A.L. y Rahman A.S. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces negative affect but not cigarette craving in overnight abstinent smokers. Frontiers in Psychiatry 4, 112. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00112
• Yang, L.Z., Shi, B., Li, H., Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Wang, H. y Hudak, J. (2017). Electrical stimulation reduces smokers’ craving by modulating the coupling between dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(8), 1296-1302. https://doi. org/10.1093/scan/nsx055
• Zawertailo, L., Zhang, H., Rahmani, N., Rajji, T. K., & Selby, P. (2022). Active versus sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an adjunct to varenicline treatment for smoking cessation: Study protocol for a double-blind single dummy randomized controlled trial. PloS one, 17(12), e0277408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277408
• Zhang, H., Rajji, T. K., Selby, P., Melamed, O., Attwells, S., & Zawertailo, L. (2023). Augmenting varenicline treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment. Brain stimulation, 16(4), 1083–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. brs.2023.07.001
• Zhao, H., Qiao, L., Fan, D., Zhang, S., Turel, O., Li, Y., Li, J., Xue, G., Chen, A., & He, Q. (2017). Modulation of Brain Activity with Noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Clinical Applications and Safety Concerns. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 685. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.00685