Publicacións en colaboración con investigadores/as de University of Pisa (11)

2021

  1. A case-only study to identify genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Nature Communications, Vol. 12, Núm. 1

  2. Erratum: Author Correction: A case-only study to identify genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers (Nature communications (2021) 12 1 (1078))

    Nature communications

2020

  1. Genome-wide association study identifies 32 novel breast cancer susceptibility loci from overall and subtype-specific analyses

    Nature Genetics, Vol. 52, Núm. 6, pp. 572-581

2019

  1. Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify target genes and risk loci for breast cancer

    Nature Communications, Vol. 10, Núm. 1

  2. Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: An ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification

    Human Mutation, Vol. 40, Núm. 9, pp. 1557-1578

  3. Publisher Correction: Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers (Nature Communications, (2019), 10, 1, (431), 10.1038/s41467-018-08054-4)

    Nature Communications

  4. Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers

    Nature Communications, Vol. 10, Núm. 1

  5. The FANCM:p.Arg658* truncating variant is associated with risk of triple-negative breast cancer

    npj Breast Cancer, Vol. 5, Núm. 1

2018

  1. Genetic testing and clinical management practices for variants in non-BRCA1/2 breast (and breast/ovarian) cancer susceptibility genes: An international survey by the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) clinical working group

    JCO Precision Oncology, Vol. 2

2017

  1. Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer

    Nature Genetics, Vol. 49, Núm. 12, pp. 1767-1778

2014

  1. Comparison of mRNA splicing assay protocols across multiple laboratories: Recommendations for best practice in standardized clinical testing

    Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 60, Núm. 2, pp. 341-352