Evaluación del nivel de acceso a nuevas tecnologías y conocimiento del riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes cardiópatas hospitalizados

  1. Javier Nogueira Pereira 1
  2. Eva Tizón Bouza 2
  3. Emiliano Fernández-Obanza Windscheid 3
  4. Raquel Marzoa Rivas 4
  1. 1 Graduado en Enfermería. Complejo hospitalario Universitario de Santiago. Sergas. Santiago de Compostela. A Coruña
  2. 2 Doctora en Enfermería. Complejo hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol. A Coruña
  3. 3 Médico especialista en Cardiología y en Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria. Complejo hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol. A Coruña
  4. 4 Doctora en Medicina. Médica especialista en Cardiología. Complejo hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol. A Coruña
Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Metas de enfermería

ISSN: 1138-7262

Ano de publicación: 2021

Volume: 24

Número: 8

Páxinas: 63-68

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.35667/METASENF.2021.24.1003081810 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Metas de enfermería

Resumo

Objective: to determine the level of access to internet among patients with cardiac conditions hospitalized at the Ferrol Area, Galicia (Spain), and to state their level of self-knowledge of cardiovascular risk (CVR) based on their estimated real cardiovascular risk. Secondary endpoints: To assess those factors related to a higher use of web resources, and to analyze those factors associated with a better knowledge of their CVR. Methods: a cross-sectional descriptive study with patients admitted to the Cardiology Unit in one month (n= 106). Sociodemographic variables were collected, as well as frequency of internet access and CVR factors. The real CVR was calculated, and compared with their self-perceived risk. Descriptive analysis was conducted, and the Chi Square test or Fisher’s Exact Test was used to analyze the association between different variables and their level of access to internet. Results: the age of the 89 patients included was 64.6 (SD:12.3) years, 76.4% were male, with basic education (58.4%) and married (75.3%). Out of these, 40.6% stated that they never accessed internet, 18% did it occasionally, 11.2% frequently, and 30.3% did it every day. The use of web resources was significantly higher in younger patients and those with higher education. Only 19.1% calculated their CVR correctly, and no factor was found to determine a higher knowledge of CVR. Conclusion: health Education is necessary and must be improved; however, the use of web resources cannot be considered currently the only tool in this health area.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Defunciones según la Causa de Muerte 2016 [internet] [citado 30 jul 2021]. Madrid: INE; 2016. Disponible en: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/Tabla.htm?path=/t15/p417/a2016/l0/&file=01001.px&L=0
  • Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1; 37(29):2315-81. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106
  • Katz DA, Graber M, Birrer E, Lounsbury P, Baldwin A, Hillis SL, et al. Health Beliefs toward Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients Admitted to Chest Pain Observation Units. Acad Emerg Med. 16 Mar [internet] 2009 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 16(5):379-87. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00383.x
  • Katz DA, Graber M, Lounsbury P, Vander Weg MW, Phillips EK, Clair C, et al. Multiple Risk Factor Counseling to Promote Heart-healthy Lifestyles in the Chest Pain Observation Unit: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. [internet] 2017 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 24(8):968-82. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acem.13231
  • Fernández S. Estudio “Los ciudadanos ante la e-Sanidad 2016”: 8 conclusiones que deberías conocer. Cuidando [internet]. [citado 30 jul 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.cuidando.es/edicion-2016-del-estudio-los-ciudadanos-ante-la-e-sanidad/
  • Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). Barómetro Mayo 2018 [internet]. Madrid: CIS; 2019. [citado 21 jul 2021]. Disponible en: http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/11_barometros/index.jsp
  • CardiosaúdeFerrol [internet]. CardiosaudeFerrol. [citado 30 jul 2021]. Disponible en: http://cardiosaudeferrol.com/
  • Buitrago F, Cañón-Barroso L, Díaz-Herrera N, Cruces-Muro E, Escobar-Fernández M, Serrano-Arias JM. Comparación de las tablas REGICOR y SCORE para la clasificación del riesgo cardiovascular y la identificación de pacientes candidatos a tratamiento hipolipemiante o antihipertensivo. Rev Esp Cardiol. [internet] 2007 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 60(02):139-47. Disponible en: https://www.revespcardiol.org/es-comparacion-tablas-regicor-score-clasificacion-articulo-13099460
  • Cooney MT, Selmer R, Lindman A, Tverdal A, Menotti A, Thomsen T, et al. Cardiovascular risk estimation in older persons: SCORE O.P. Eur J Prev Cardiol. [internet] Jun 2015 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 23(10):1093-103. Disponble en: https://academic.oup.com/eurjpc/article/23/10/1093/5927274
  • Pérez-Manchón D, Álvarez-García GM, González-López E. Percepción de riesgo cardiovascular en una población ambulatoria de la Comunidad de Madrid. Hipertens Riesgo Vasc. [internet] 2015 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 32(3):100-4. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-hipertension-riesgo-vascular-67-articulo-percepcion-riesgo-cardiovascular-una-poblacion-S1889183714000890
  • Gordon NP, Hornbrook MC. Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth.Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan. J Med Internet Res. [internet] 2016 Mar 4 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 18(3): e50. Disponible en: https://www.jmir.org/2016/3/e50
  • Wildenbos GA, Peute L, Jaspers M. Facilitators and Barriers of Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Older Adults: A Literature Study. Stud Health Technol Inform. [internet] 2017 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 235:308-12. Disponible en: https://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/46352
  • Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, Towfigh AA, Haggstrom DA, Miake-Lye I, et al. Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. [internet] 2013 Nov 19 [citado 30 jul 2021]; 159(10):677-87. Disponible en: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00006?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&
Fonte de datos: Dialnet