Niveles de evidencia de los diagnósticos NANDA-I relacionados con lesiones cutáneas

  1. José María Rumbo Prieto
Revista:
Enfermería Dermatológica

ISSN: 1888-3109 2386-4818

Ano de publicación: 2022

Ano: 16

Número: 45

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.6590606 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Enfermería Dermatológica

Resumo

In this opinion article we will comment that NANDA-I has been working since 2002 to classify the levels of evidence (validity theory) of nursing diagnoses. In this way, it aims to reflect the state of evidence-based practice (EBP) in association with the standardized nursing language taxonomy. The hierarchical structure of levels of evidence followed by NANDA-I is organized into three main levels (level 1, level 2 and level 3) representing the state of theoretical-clinical development and the strength of the available evidence; and in turn, each level is composed of several sublevels representing the method of study. However, the NANDA-I Diagnostic Development Committee is already working since 2021 on a new classification that lowers the levels of evidence to 2 types, but includes clinical indicators and criteria of higher quality by expanding the sublevels. It is expected that the new evidence scale will be implemented in future editions.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services. London: A Rock Carling Fellowship. Nuffield Trust; 1972.
  • Cochrane AL. efectividad y eficiencia: reflexiones al azar sobre los servicios sanitarios. Barcelona: Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano: Fundación Salud, Innova-ción y Sociedad; 2000.
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine. A new approach to teaching the prac-tice of medicine. JAMA. 1992; 268(17): 2420-5.
  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, Gary J, Haynes RB, Rich-ards WS. Evidence Based Medicine: what is it and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996; (312): 71-2.
  • Ingersoll GL. Evidence-Based Nursing: What it is and what it isn’t. Nurs Outlook. 2000; 48(4): 151-2
  • Alcolea Cosín MT, Oter Quintana C, Martín García A. Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia. orígenes y funda-mentos para una práctica enfermera basada en la evidencia. NURE Investig. 2011; (52): 1-7.
  • Gregory RJ. The history of psychological testing. In: Psychological testing: history, principles and applica-tions. 6 th ed.). London: Pearson education; 2010.
  • De Oliveira Lopes MV, Martins da Silva V, Lopes Mon-teiro da Cruz DA. Criterios de nivel de evidencia revi-sados para el envío de diagnósticos. En: Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, Takáo C, editoras. NANDA International. Diagnósticos Enfermeros. Definiciones y Clasificación 2021-2023. (12ª edición). Barcelona: Elsevier España; 2021. p. 57-78.
  • Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, editors. NANDA Interna-tional Nursing Diagnoses. Definitions and Classifica-tion 2018-2020. Eleventh Edition. [epub]. New York: Thieme; 2018.
  • Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, Takáo C, editoras. NANDA International. Diagnósticos Enfermeros. Definiciones y Clasificación 2021-2023. (12ª edición). Barcelona: Elsevier España; 2021.